HISTORY 204 - MINIMALISM

(F-11)

 

1.  Minimalism designates a style that arose in the mid-60s and thrived until the 80s

Was seen at the time as a reaction against the domination of modern music by serialism,  against the complexity of serial organization - Minimalist composers wrote pieces based on simplest means possible

“Minimalism”  means different things to different people – Do “minimalist pieces” have anything in common?

Simple textures - few vertical or horizontal complications - only one or 2 things going on at a time - easy for listener to hear what's going on  - "listener-friendly"

Tonal - i.e. a) based on overtone series, and b) clear tonic sense for long stretches - However rarely based on common-practice harmonies – rarely organized by cadence

New approach to harmony – harmonies not established by contrapuntal, chord-to-chord voice leading – more like a cloud of harmonies

New approach to form - Nothing has to "happen" in a piece, the form of the piece doesn't have to be marked by "events" like themes, cadences, etc. - Piece becomes more "process," less "product"

New sense of time - Time suspended by stasis and repetition - not marked by musical arrivals and departures

Some of these features have evolved or disappeared over the period 1965-2000 - By now very little new music can be  identified as "minimalist" in style, but we can still speak of minimalist techniques

 

2.  Minimalist compositional techniques developed during 60s  - many of the characteristic techniques derived from electronic music techniques:

Repetition - tape loops, repeated instrumental patterns

Incremental change - Each pattern very similar to contiguous patterns - process of gradual shifts (may be written out or left to performers)

Phasing  - i.e. playing pattern against itself - canon at very close interval - Based on tape multi-tracking (This technique turned up in pop music too - e.g. Brian Eno, King Crimson)

Where did we hear these techniques in electronic music?

repetition – Schaeffer, Studies; Oswald, Birth; Dodge, Days

incremental change – Wang, Flaherty;

phasing – Flaherty, Dodge

(if time) Example: "It's Gonna Rain" (1965) – Reich took the voice of a street-corner preacher in Union Square, broke it down into its component sounds and looped it against itself – PLAY

Reich's slogan: "Music as a gradual process" (Prep 9)

 

3.  Steve Reich – Piano Phase (1967) (Supplementary)

Example of similar techniques applied to instrumental music – Again repetition, incremental change, phasing

2 pianos play the same simple, 16th-note pattern – 12 notes at the beginning – Piano 1 begins, piano 2 enters in unison

Then piano 2 begins to speed up slightly – For a while the two pianos are “out of phase,” i.e. their notes aren’t together – As piano 2 continues a little faster, the 1st 16th of its pattern reaches the 2nd 16th of piano – Now the pianos are back “in phase,” but the counterpoint is different – Each of these different contrapuntal patterns are shown on the score – the “out of phase” sections are shown as repeat marks in between

After 12 different combinations – and 12 “out of phase” transitions, the 2 pianos are in unison again – Then they move to pattern 2, which has only 8 notes – After all those combinations are exhausted they move to pattern 3 which is only 4 notes – Thus the effect over the entire piece is like a stretto

Good performers will stretch this process for quite a long time, reveling in the “out of phase” sections

This music requires active listening - listeners create patterns for themselves, especially in the out-of-phase sections – At a given moment, one listener may be hearing a different pattern from what his neighbor hears [like the duck-rabbit or old-young woman drawings]

 

4. Steve Reich – Tehillim (1981) NAWM 197

Setting of four Biblical Psalms (Tehillim is the Hebrew name of the Book of Psalms – literally it means "praises") – Example in NAWM is Psalm 150 ("Praise him with drum and dance, etc")

After the "phase" compositions of the 1960s Reich began experimenting with music for larger ensembles and more complex textures – used same techniques (repetition, incremental change, phasing) to develop larger structures where events happen on several different levels (not just micro level as in Piano Phase) – Example was Music for 18 Musicians (1976): striking at the time as more lyrical and for longer-range harmonic development

Tehillim was first Reich piece that set words – Reich had used words in the electronic pieces, but hadn't really set them; he used voices in 18 Musicians but not words – Text isn't comprehensible, but word meanings (praise and rejoicing) are very clearly set

Same techniques of repetition, phasing, incremental change – But repetition doesn't last as long as Piano Phase (and other earlier pieces) and is distributed over many more parts as canon – phasing isn't gradual, but sudden shifts, global changes added to incremental

Divided into sections (double bars) – each section sets new line of text and has different texture from previous section – Thus change doesn't seem so incremental, more sudden and goal-oriented – sections outlined and described in NAWM table

Rhythms – very rapid 8th, grouped alternately into 2s and 3s according to stressed and unstressed syllables – symbols above violin part tell conductor how to beat (triangle is long beat (three 8ths), stroke is short beat (two 8ths)

Has Tehillim abandoned Reich's "Music as a gradual process" ideology?

         

5.  Arvo Pärt (b. 1935) – “O Wisdom” and “O King of all peoples” (NAWM 170) – from 7 Magnificat Antiphons (1988/ rev. 1991)

Example of another kind of minimalism that has little or nothing to do with electronic music techniques – We could call this “spiritual minimalism” because it’s goal is to attain or introduce meditation or heightened consciousness – Other composers who engage in “spiritual minimalism” include Terry Riley, LaMonte Young

Based on simplest possible musical materials: diatonic pitches, triadic harmonies, drones, stepwise movement of voices, repetition of elements

Pärt is Estonian – Came to this style via a) serialism; b) study of plainchant, Renaissance polyphony and JS Bach; c) religious conviction – None of these endeared him to Soviet music establishment – Pärt emigrated to Germany in 1980

Antiphons are example of Pärt’sTintinnabuli” (bells) technique, which he developed in 70s – a very “minimal” technique for harmonizing a tune – Each note of the tune is harmonized with the closest note of the triad on the keynote – something like fauxbourdon - effect is that we hear a triad “ringing” throughout the piece – this could be considered an extremely simple serial technique

“O Weisheit  (p. 1412) – PLAY – Tune is in tenor in 3rds– Every other word is harmonized with an A-major triad (even though the melody may have a note that isn’t in the triad) -  Effect is like bells ringing in A major throughout the piece 

“O König” (p. 1414) – Similar technique but canonic – Same melody in tenor 2 and soprano 2 – They sing mensuration canon – Tenor is twice as fast, so when he finishes he sings the inversion – Alto chants words on D – other voices sing D minor triad according to rule above

    PLAY – try to sing along with S-2 or T-2

Study the NAWM notes on this piece, which are good

 

5.  Maturing of minimalism in 80s

Simple textures and tonal orientation of minimalism have proved popular with audiences

Techniques, sounds and clichés of minimalism have been pursued by composers who don't share mystical or "music as process" aesthetic – Minimalism has pretty much outlived its origins as a reaction to serialism

Original band of composers (Reich, Glass) have turned away from phasing and looping towards more through-composed and more lyrical techniques (Terry Riley and LaMonte Young have remained more true to the original vision)

New composers have adopted techniques like repetition, layering, phasing into much more complicated textures (e.g. John Adams)

New compositions are more about product or meaning than about process

 

 

4.  John Adams (b. 1947) – Short Ride in a Fast Machine (1986)– NAWM 198

"Fanfare for Orchestra" – for MTT

Example of escalation of minimalist techniques to create great complexity (NAWM analysis points this out) – Is this culmination or subversion of minimalism?

Adams (b. 1947) bio and works

Harvard trained

At SFCM 1972-82 – Involved with tape music center, various avant garde projects –

Phrygian Gates (1977) for Mack McCray, Shaker Loops (1978), Harmonium (1981), Harmonielehre (1984) – All these use minimalist techniques of repetition and incremental change

But Adams was much more interested in harmony than other "minimalist" composers – These pieces feature harmonic effects similar to Reich/Glass rhythmic and contrapuntal effects – Harmonic change without voice-leading, without cadences – "clouds of harmony" slowly changing throughout the piece (or sometimes changing suddenly as in Phrygian Gates)

Nixon in China (1987) – dir. Peter Sellars – Based on Nixon's visit to the People's Republic in 1971 – Very successful – doesn't tell a story but presents a succession of scenes based on real events – Music tends to be static for duration of scene – Effecting setting of very repetitive text ("News, news, news") –

Subsequent operas not as successful – Death of Klinghofer (1991) accused (unjustly) of anti-Semitism ; Dr. Atomic (2005) had last-minute, ineffectual libretto

Short Ride

Good analysis in NAWM – Two big points: 1) rhythmic ambiguity: shifting meters, overlapping meters; 2) 2 harmonic procedures: a) gradual addition of pitches to collection; b) sudden harmonic changes ("gates") by adding or (more often) subtracting notes so we suddenly hear a new collection

Example of overlapping rhythms at beginning – woodblock vs. brass vs. winds – examples of shifting meters from m. 14 on – PLAY from beginning

Example in same passage of gradually adding pitches to collection – PLAY again

Example of "gate" at m.52 (cue 36) – from E major (more or less) to Bb major (more or less) – But both pitch collections are more complicated, not triadic – PLAY

Is this "music as an audible process"? – Quite the opposite, I think