MHL 204 –EXPERIMENTAL MUSIC

(F-11)

 

1.  What is “experimental music”?

David Nicholls:  Experimental music “lies outside the tradition” – How does a composer create music outside the tradition? – by ignoring tradition, by defying tradition, by trying things that “aren’t music”

John Cage:  "An experimental action is an action the outcome of which is not foreseen” – Cage means chance music and/or improvised music, but could also include Ives quarter-tone pianos, or Varese all-percussion orchestra (Ionisation), or playing a record backwards

We could also say: Music that tries something that no one has tried before – or Music that challenges people’s previous ideas about what music is

“Experimentalism” as a historical movement with a beginning (c. 1900), middle, end – But has it reached an end, or is it near an end? – Not as obviously as 12-tone music

American Experimentalist tradition

Probably stronger than in Europe - perhaps because definitions were felt here as somewhat external and illegitimate – to create really “American” music composers had to free themselves from European musical traditions – Also because composers here had no tradition and no status and thus nothing to lose

Examples of American experimentalists:  Ives, Seeger (covered already) – also Cowell, Cage, Varese, Partch, Nancarrow

  American experimentalists seem to have concentrated particularly on technical challenges, i.e. developing new instruments and new techniques of playing old instruments -- This seems to be more of a focus here than in Europe

 

2.  Henry Cowell (1897-1965)

  First American to achieve notoriety as avant-gardist - Child prodigy - Began composing expanded-technique piano works from 1912 - noted in particular for "tone clusters" played with fists and forearm -- toured as A-G piano virtuoso in 1920's delighting in scandals  -- book New Musical Resources (1919) - arguments for systematic redefinitions: e.g. exchanging consonance for dissonance, equation of pitch with rhythm, micro-intervals, etc.

  Leading public figure of American Avant-garde, performed, wrote, lectured, organized - e.g. biography of Ives, "New Musical Quarterly" - Locked up on a morals charge in 50s (soliciting teenage boys) - Taught at Peabody

   The Banshee (1925) - A new and very influential Cowell technique: working inside the piano – PLAY – How does this challenge definitions? (changes definition of what you do when you "play the piano")

 

3,  Edgard Varèse (1883-1965) – Hyperprism (1923)

The godfather of the American Avant-garde – in his music, in his organizational energy and in his confrontational spirit – Coined Frank Zappa's motto:  "Dying is the privilege of the weary.  The present day composers refuse to die" (International Composers Guild manifesto, 1921)

  Born in Paris and trained there - came to U.S. by choice because he thought future of new music was brighter here

  Composed most of his music in 1920's - Also most active as organizer then (International Composers' Guild, 1921-28) – Hyperprism (1923), Octandre, Integrales, Ionisation (for percussion ensemble,1931)

  Then long creative hiatus and bad humor during 30's and 40's - V. seems to have felt disillusioned, disappointed and bitter at hostility of public - Prophesied electronic media as heirs of instruments and eagerly embraced them when they became available – Déserts (1954) for orchestra and tape (alternating)

  V. challenged all previous definitions of what were materials of music (melody, accompaniment, harmony, form) - He defined music as "organized sound" - WHAT would this definition include as "music"?

  His works of 20's concerned themselves mainly with timbres: organization, sequence and juxtaposition of timbres -- Also with volumes and with absolute pitches

  Hyperprism (1923)   NAWM 178

For wind band and very large percussion section  - 7 to 10 percussionists playing 20 instruments

  New role of percussion - Not used rhythmically but texturally and timbrally - We hear pulse but not rhythms -- Instruments include: anvil, tam-tam, siren, Lion's roar (string drum) -- leads toward Ionisation (1930) for percussion ensemble

Varèse distinguished between "rhythm" vs. "meter" – rhythm was patterns of sounds in time and space, counterpoint of attack and density; meter was beat (more or less) – Varèse wanted to free rhythm from meter

PLAY – Listen for treatment of rhythm and of pitch  – Entirely free treatment of dissonance – Nothing like melody – we hear: 1) pitches held or repeated, 2) short motifs repeated, 3) sound masses – Rhythm freed from meter (although there are places where we think we may hear a pulse)

Varese never explained procedures – described his music with metaphors from physical world (quasi-scientific) – Described Hyperprism with image of crystal: Limited number of internal structures vs. limitless possibilities of external form

Internal structures take the form of motifs, timbres or pitches - e.g. rising triplet motif at beginning, brass cluster timbre, insistence on C# (Varese said he later realized this was a New York City police siren, which he had been hearing on and off as he composed the piece)

 

6.  John Cage  (1912-1992)

Began like Cowell and Varese with expansion of instrumental techniques, timbres and possibilities

Percussion pieces in late 30's - e.g. Double Music with Lou Harrison - Backyard percussion ensemble made out of brake drums, etc.

Prepared piano – sound of the piano is transformed by inserting objects on and between the strings - materials include bolts, tacks, wires, spoons, rubber plugs etc - Turns piano into a very capable, but oddly limited, percussion instrument – Cage said he invented the technique when he was working as a dance-studio accompanist –  C. wrote many PP pieces in 40's - In most cases each piece required individual preparation - Technique was C's trademark for about a decade – Examples: The Perilous Night (1944),

Sonatas and Interludes (1948) NAWM 187

Large cycle of prepared-piano pieces – All use the same preparation (NAWM p. 540 – Modeled on Scarlatti keyboard sonatas with 2 repeated sections, 2nd one usually longer

PLAY Sonata #5 – compare what you see to what you hear – more like a percussion ensemble than a piano

Cage described Sonatas and Interludes as wandering along a beach, picking up pretty stones and examining them – i.e. explore sounds that preparation has made available in the piano – But at the same time the phrases and proportions are carefully calculated to achieve balance

 

7.  Transformation of Cage’s style in early 1950s – Sought way of composing that would embody philosophy of Zen Buddhism and that would “let sounds by themselves” instead of being symbols for something else

Cage studied Zen Buddhism (with Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki in late 40s) –Zen notion of man's (or woman's) role in life as fitting himself into the world, moving with the world instead of trying to shape and change the world

Applying this idea to music, Cage believes that the composer shouldn't try to shape, mold or determine what sounds will occur in music; composer should not impose his own taste on the listener; composer should only create a situation in which performers and listeners can find and experience music themselves

Three more central ideas for Cage:

1. Noises are as useful as so-called musical tones, for the simple reason that they are sounds – all sounds can potentially be music

2.  Silence is crucial to music – Silence isn’t the absence of sound but the the absence of intended sound – If we give up intention, then we hear silence – This was the meaning of 4’ 33”

3.  There is no firm line between "music" and "not music" -- "Everything is music" if we want it to be

NAWM distinguishes between indeterminacy and chance – This is a distinction that wasn’t made much at the time, but it’s useful – Cage mentioned it in his essay on the “History of Experimental Music”: “indeterminacy with respect to composition” vs. “indeterminacy with respect to performance”

Chance music – composer determines pitches, rhythms, timbres, etc by using chance operations (e.g. flipping a coin), But the composer notates entire piece in all aspects, and the performer plays what the composer has written – Also called aleatoric music

Indeterminacy – Composer notates only some aspects, leaves others up to decisions by performers – e.g. pitch in Penderecki’s Threnody

In both cases the composer only partially determines what the listener is going to hear – his influence is attenuated, highly mediated – But NB this is the case also the case in Bach (continuo realization) and Rossini (vocal coloratura)

Music of Changes (1951) (NAWM 166)

This is example of “chance” music (not indeterminacy)

Cage decided on the pitches, the rhythms, registers, textures, etc. by flipping coins and then consulting the I Ching (book of Changes), which is an ancient Chinese text used for fortune telling – NAWM tries to describe the procedures he used, but don’t worry about them

Important points:

Cage had to decide in advance on the overall shape of the piece and what sounds or rhythms etc. the random operations would choose among

After that the piece is determined by chance

Cage notates everything – the performer plays as faithfully as possible – Thus this isn’t indeterminate music

PLAY at random

Unfortunately we don’t have an example in the syllabus of an "indeterminate" piece by Cage – Famous example is 4' 33" (1952) in which the performer sits at an instrument but does not play; what audience hears is determined by ambient noise at that particular moment – Another example is Imaginary Landscape IV (1951), in which instruments are 12 radios, which performers tune to different stations (following a score!) ; what audience hears is determined by what happens to be on the radio that night

People imagine that Cage was giving performers license to do whatever they pleased and call it music – This is a big misconception – Cage insisted that performers execute his instructions carefully and in good faith – Otherwise they would just be substituting their whims for the composer’s whims and the result would be very far from the Zen philosophy of fitting in with the world

 

8.  Luciano Berio (1925-2003) – Sequenza III  for soprano – NAWM 192

Berio's sequenzas are intended to explore possibilities of various instruments, using playing techniques that "extend" beyond what's asked for in traditional repertory – Something like 14 by now – most popular are for flute, trombone, guitar, accordion

Sequenza III is example of “extended technique” for singer – written for Cathy Berberian (Berios wife at the time)

What are some extended techniques in Sequenza III?

speech vs. song

vowel timbres

other vocal sounds (e.g. clicks)

PLAY

Do “extended” techniques eventually get absorbed into “normal” techniques? – e.g. shifting on violin, vibrato, harmonics, thumb on keyboard – Do some techniques never get absorbed?

Notation – extended techniques require new notation – Berio's instructions at beginning (other Sequenze have fewer instructions) – open to interpretation by performers – performance practice traditions

PLAY various versions on the web

Cathy Berberian

Silvia Spinnato

Carmina Escobar

And while you're at it, don't miss sequenza V for trombone, as performed by

Dave Day