WRITING I (Spitzer-Laurance)
(F-09)
Goal of class: To outline the process of writing the final
paper
1. Choosing a topic (EL)
Start with reading and listening
Two
models:
a)
specific to general
“Here’s a document no one has noticed”
“There’s a contradiction in what Quantz says”
“I didn’t know Haydn used that harmony”
Need to put specific observation into
broad context
b)
general to specific
“I’m interested in Verdi’s early operas”
“I’d like to
look into 18th-century bows”
Need to find specific case to illuminate topic of interest
Alternate between general and specific – i.e. read
and listen broadly, then follow up on specific leads
Be alert for “leverage” – i.e. a document, a piece,
an insight, a contradiction . . . that
seems to bring things into focus
Estimate availability of sources – Don’t choose a
topic where sources are unavailable to you – Don’t be over-optimistic – The
internet can make sources look more available than they are
When to give up on a topic – not really interested, hate
the piece after all, nothing to say right now, sources unavailable – Talk to seminar
instructor about whether it’s time to give up
Gathering sources (JS)
Brief!
– We’ll cover this later
What is a “source”? – facsimile
of score or book, modern score, contemporary book, modern book or article,
online information, etc. etc.
chain from one source to the
next (read the footnotes!)
appropriate sources:
xerox, copy out, bookmark, save URL etc. – label everything (per last
week)
alternate between gathering and
thinking – “to xerox is not to know”
Formulating ideas /
hypotheses / theses (JS)
We formulate ideas by interacting with sources
dialogue
with reading – commentary, responses (discussed last week)
dialogue with music (scores, recordings) – Here the means of
interaction may be less obvious or less explicit – But this is the starting
point for a lot of research we undertake – especially repertory we’re
performing – Example to come
Test out your ideas in writing – provisional
arguments, sample hypotheses, commentary on potential musical examples
Go back a step and gather some more sources against
which you test your arguments and hypotheses
All this is provisional - Everything will change –
Any hypothesis you formulate at this stage will turn out to be wrong – In my
experience you know you’re starting to get somewhere when you abandon your
original hypothesis
EXAMPLE
of dialogue with music (scores, recordings)
PLAY
Haydn Symphony 23 in G major, minuet and trio (JS)
What do you notice? (canon)
What questions does this raise?
common
in Haydn? in other composers?
why
minuet? (sometimes
just trio)
what
did it mean to audiences?
is
canon used elsewhere in symphonies, quartets?
Pre-writing – How much to
shape before you write? (EL)
We have no prescription – Every writer develops his
or her own strategies – Find out what works for you (perhaps you already have)
Continuum from flying blind to super-detailed outline
HANDOUT Spitzer vs Laurance writing processes
Emily interrogate John about his process
John interrogate Emily about her process
Timetable for the paper (EL)
12 Oct – Paper topic (thesis?
questions?)
9 Nov – Sources (also re-state thesis)
23 Nov – Draft of paper
14 Dec - Finished paper
We’ll specify what we want more closely in
each seminar